search close
picture Report

Joint submission to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe concerning the implementation of Identoba group cases - 7.11.2025

10 November 2025
This submission by the signatory organisations aims to respond to the Government’s action report of 2 July 2025 that followed the adoption of the Committee’s Interim resolution in the Identoba group of cases at its March 2025 DH meeting. Despite the Committee’s very clear call to repeal the discriminatory legislation and its consideration of the law as a ‘backward step raising ‘serious questions as to compliance’with the Identoba group judgments, the Government strongly defended the need for this law indicating a clear shift from its obligations arising under the Identoba group judgments concerning rights of LGBTI persons.

This submission provides the Committee with our assessment of such defiant actions of the Government. It focuses both on individual measures concerning Aghdgomelashvili and Japaridze v. Georgia (Application no. 7224/11, judgment of 8 October 2020, final on 8 January 2021) and Women's Initiatives Supporting Group and Others v. Georgia (Application nos. 73204/13 and 74959/13, judgment of 16 December 2021, final on 16 March 2022), as well as general measures relating to LGBTI rights issues across the broader group.

We assess the most recent developments, primarily the adoption of the discriminatory legislation explicitly banning certain rights and otherwise restricting the ability of LGBTI people and their supporters of their fundamental Convention rights, contrary to the obligations arising from the Court’s findings and in defiance to the Committee’s recommendations and its most recent Interim Resolution. The growing evidence clearly demonstrates that Georgia is not willing to comply with the respective judgments and its deliberate acts aimed at discriminating LGBTI persons points to the contrary. On this basis, we call upon the Committee to examine this group of cases at the nearest possible opportunity and consider taking stronger measures, such as the initiation of infringement proceedings, in light of Georgia’s clear refusal to comply with these cases. 

Read the full sumbission.